Comments on: Unofficial 2008 Qualifier Standings

By: marksy

marksy — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 18:00:07 +0000

My thoughts are that it is not wise to make predictions

By: Moses

Moses — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 17:29:28 +0000

Your the BEST Marksy!!

What are your thoughts on the Bantam age group for all divisions?

By: marksy

marksy — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:57:04 +0000

I’m not 100% sure but I don’t think so. When 3 or more teams are tied then the formula (GF/GF+GA) is used using the scores of the games between those three teams only.

In this case I have a formula coming out with Halton as being .556, Akwesasne as being .524, and Whitby as being .429.

Of course check the OLA site to be sure. It will be out soon.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:36:15 +0000

shouldnt akwasasne be 2nd whitby 3rd and halton 4th because of the head to head

By: marksy

marksy — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 21:01:00 +0000

Thanks Roger, I keyed in the game this morning wrong for Burlington. I believe the goals are now correct, but will double check….

By: Roger Noseworthy

Roger Noseworthy — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:32:31 +0000

GF & GA for Burlington are also not correct.

I believe they should be 30 for and 28 against.

By: Roger Noseworthy

Roger Noseworthy — Sat, 26 Jul 2008 17:25:01 +0000

Burlington PW standings are incorrect – they are now 4-3-2 after 9 games not 3-3-3. This gives them 10 points – tied with Newmarket & Brampton. Since they beat Brampton last week, they are actually ahead of them in the standings.

This morning they beat Miss 7-3.