Please note that these are unofficial. But according to my scores I have, and with a great little Excel sheet I received from Guntis Glinavs from London, this should be bang on. The best part of this is that in two weeks I will be able to update this as each set of games are played, so the standings will be up to the last games played.
| Peewee | ||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | T | Pts | GF | GA | Formula |
| Clarington | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 44 | 27 | 0.620 |
| Newmarket | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 25 | 16 | 0.610 |
| Orangeville | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 22 | 16 | 0.579 |
| Burlington | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 18 | 16 | 0.529 |
| Brampton | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 21 | 23 | 0.477 |
| Whitby | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 34 | 28 | 0.548 |
| Six Nations | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 21 | 26 | 0.447 |
| Oakville | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 28 | 29 | 0.491 |
| Peterborough | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 24 | 0.489 |
| K-W | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 27 | 0.460 |
| Halton Hills | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 26 | 31 | 0.456 |
| Mississauga | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 | 37 | 0.288 |
| Bantam | ||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | T | Pts | GF | GA | Formula |
| Six Nations | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 32 | 19 | 0.627 |
| Akwesasne | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 37 | 22 | 0.627 |
| Guelph | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 22 | 0.577 |
| Halton Hills | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 30 | 22 | 0.577 |
| Whitby | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 36 | 27 | 0.571 |
| St. Catharines | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 34 | 31 | 0.523 |
| Peterborough | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 37 | 23 | 0.617 |
| Brampton | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 24 | 28 | 0.462 |
| Orangeville | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 34 | 25 | 0.576 |
| Welland | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 36 | 0.379 |
| K-W | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 37 | 0.383 |
| Mimico | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 23 | 39 | 0.371 |
| London | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 0.218 |
| Midget | ||||||||
| Team | GP | W | L | T | PTS | GF | GA | Formula |
| Whitby | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 51 | 15 | 0.773 |
| Orangeville | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 35 | 18 | 0.660 |
| Brampton | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 28 | 16 | 0.636 |
| Six Nations | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 32 | 22 | 0.593 |
| Halton Hills | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 27 | 22 | 0.551 |
| Elora | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 23 | 25 | 0.479 |
| Peterborough | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 31 | 34 | 0.477 |
| Barrie | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 27 | 34 | 0.443 |
| Akwesasne | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 25 | 33 | 0.431 |
| St.Catharines | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 32 | 0.385 |
| K-W | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 37 | 0.351 |
| Mississauga | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 27 | 42 | 0.391 |
| Oakville | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 36 | 0.357 |
6 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
Leave a comment
In MIdget, shouldn’t ELora be ahead of HH since they both have 6 points but in Head to Head Elora beat Halton. Does this not supercede the GF GA forumula?
I’m not sure what the tie breaker is, you might be right. I will find out and correct if that is the case.
The tie-breaker for head-to-head would not come into effect until all the games had been played. For now the spreadsheet you have would be correct, because they have not yet played all the same teams.
Thanks for the clarification.
The actual tiebreaker which will be interesting is first, head to head. If more than two teams are tied then the GF/GA formula comes into play. NOTE: Only the GF/GA between the teams that are tied are first used in the process. If there is still a tie, all results from the two weekends will be taken into consideration.
Thanks. I do recall that it is only the teams tied…..